Like just about everyone
else, as an author and as a reader, I have been curious about Google’s much
discussed library of scanned books. The
Author’s Guild newsletter keeps me informed but I’m still not sure if I should
hope for new future royalties on past books or instead look at the benefits of instant access to scanned books
when I write new ones.
So when the Google Book Reader showed up among the apps offered
on my still relatively new iPhone I tried it out. And I learned some surprising
things.
One of the sample texts on Book Reader
was a Joseph Conrad novella, The Shadow
Line. I read it while stranded in an airport waiting room, with the happy realization
that if it worked, this system would provide a handy source of emergency
reading material.
The Conrad novella put me in mind of
another Conrad work, Under Western Eyes, the 1911 novel about
terrorism that had come up in a recent news story. I’m a fan of Conrad’s Secret Agent, whose agent provocateur theme
seems relevant today, so I made a mental note to read Under Western Eyes. I searched
the free books list on Book Reader and there it was—in the public domain. I could try it for free.
I
found reading the scanned books on the iPhone quite satisfactory. The type was clear and it was easy to drag the
words down the screen with my thumb. It
beat Kindle and the Sony reader with its irritating page refresh flicker.
But occasionally there were stutters, so to speak, in the
scanning process. An earlier reader’s
notes and underlining in the copy of Conrad being scanned confused it. Even bits of grit or loose paper appeared to throw
off the character recognition software. Words
would get random #s or &s in them. French phrases in the English would
confuse the device so it threw in asterisks and tildes and brevets. Every now and then it would give up
completely and erupt in string of dingbats like comic book cursing. A couple of underlined sentences were
suddenly reproduced photographically, in the original type, not the screen
type. Then it would angrily hit the
virtual carriage return a few times, producing a three quarter inch blank space.
My scanner doesn’t work to well,
either, but I was surprised that Google, that tech giant, did not have better
ones.
And I was really surprised by what happened next: like a dirty photo falling from between the pages of a book a photo popped up. Right beside my fingers on the screen was an image of other fingers---those of the person who had fed the pages. The foreigner wore a single finger latex glove---a finger condom, I would have to call it—a bright pink lilac thing. The level of care of the person’s nails was nothing to brag about. I say person, but I think “man” because of the lack of manicure attention.
Was it the condom
that made the picture seem obscene and pornographic? The suddenness of its appearance suggested
scanning as an unclean process; I thought with horror of the guy who found a
finger in his bowl of fast food chili.
So this was the literal hand of the
powerful Google? The fickle fingers of
the Google that holds my copyright fate in the balance?
What did
such sloppiness say about how much we can trust Google or how much we should
fear it? Trust Google to make decent copies of
the books they are scanning, to begin with, because as we debate the
real issues of rights versus access,
most of us, I believe, took for
granted the books would be perfectly rendered.
But the scanning errors I found made the text corrupt. In addition to the mangled lines, I have no
idea how many lines or even pages could have been left out completely. The novel has a Russian setting and some of
what I took to be transliterated terms of Russian might simply have been
scanner artifacts.
Thta was an inspiring post,
Nice advice about googles fingers... but its really confusing,
Thanks for bringing this up
Posted by: software development | January 08, 2010 at 03:32 AM
I just want to emphasize the good work on this blog, has excellent views and a clear vision of what you are looking for
Posted by: buy propecia | January 25, 2010 at 09:28 AM
I really like this blog, you are very good making them. I say that the issue discussed in this blog is quite interesting and of high quality.
Posted by: soft cialis | March 01, 2010 at 08:55 AM
Thanks for providing such a great site. I'll be coming back regularly to see what's new. Thanks Again
Posted by: Cheap lots in Costa Rica | March 17, 2010 at 03:32 PM
google fingers was a strange post!
Posted by: thyroid t4 hormone | March 26, 2010 at 09:15 AM
excellent sport engines and are fast car kit definitely my thing, adrenaline and emotion behind the wheel is great, congratulations on the blog is excellent and the subject of the best, thanks for sharing.
Posted by: kamagra online | April 22, 2010 at 09:28 AM
i like this part of the blog:"What did such sloppiness say about how much we can trust Google or how much we should fear it? Trust Google to make decent copies of the books they are scanning, to begin with, because as we debate the real issues of rights versus access, most of us, I believe, took for granted the books would be perfectly rendered. " is very good
Posted by: buy generic viagra | April 22, 2010 at 01:06 PM
And did you know that the fast food and casual dining restaurants you eat in every day have secret menu items? A select few are in on the secret and now you are a part of this culinary elite. We aren't just talking about the barely secret In-N-Out Burger "hold the bread, lettuce wrapped burger,” oh no. We have items all over town, including an unhealthy smoothie at Jamba Juice and a San Francisco-only Mc10:35. The Consumerist is all over this, and now you can be too!!!
Posted by: sildenafil citrate | April 22, 2010 at 04:12 PM
yesterday i was looking for on this topic all day. your blog looks really interesting for me what I want to congratulate all the information and the work I do on his blog. good job
Posted by: buy cialis | April 27, 2010 at 09:12 AM
next week I'll be presenting my graduation project. i was looking for on this topic all day. your blog looks really interesting for me what I want to congratulate all the information and the work I do on his blog. great work
Posted by: buy cialis | April 27, 2010 at 10:12 AM
Thank you for sharing information !! What this article teach us that how much we can trust on Google. You have shared very important thing with us. It sound like your are very experienced person. Great Work Man !! Keep It up !! Have a very good evening !!
Posted by: portable scanner | May 20, 2010 at 07:04 AM
You have discution very important thing with us and excellent bookmarking in your article.
Posted by: managerial accounting homework | June 20, 2010 at 04:11 AM
Google is doing very nice work
thanks for sharing this information
.....Alex
Posted by: cheap viagra online | July 06, 2010 at 01:35 AM
What if the Suri kid is ugly and they're too embarassed to show the thing off? Santa, that's what I want for Christmas. I've beeen a very good girl, I've worked very hard, I'm a nice person...PLEASE let Suri be ugly as my reward.
Posted by: costa rica investments | July 27, 2010 at 01:05 PM
Yes... it seems that the media is very biased to their own way of thinking and hasn't improved since you wrote this article.
Posted by: CNA Practice Test | July 27, 2010 at 11:42 PM
Thank you so much Tim. I really do appreciate your feedback. I'm still struggling with the technology but I wish everyone all luck with this competition. I've been pinned down with a sick grandchild and today a very sick daughter - both with gastric flu which afflicts us all at this time of year - so this is the first moment I've had to get to the computer.
Posted by: viagra online | August 18, 2010 at 10:54 AM
Google can develop new technology for scanned books indexing.
Posted by: cheap xanax | September 05, 2010 at 06:28 AM
This is a great blog. What are the RSS feed urls?
Posted by: CNA Training | October 31, 2010 at 10:36 AM
There are many reasons why women do not want to try out some fantasies.
Posted by: BDSM Toys | December 08, 2010 at 02:42 AM
Men marry because they are tired; women because they are curious; both are disappointed
Posted by: Shox Running Shoes | February 15, 2011 at 06:02 PM
Taylor has been buried in the same cemetery buried with micro-Bo Jackson mourn Taylor was buried today in Los Angeles Glendale "Forest Lawn" Cemetery. And her friend Michael Jackson was buried alive with more than 50 family members attended the funeral
Posted by: Cheap Jordans | March 25, 2011 at 09:58 AM
Taylor has been buried in the same cemetery buried with micro-Bo Jackson mourn Taylor was buried today in Los Angeles Glendale "Forest Lawn" Cemetery. And her friend Michael Jackson was buried alive with more than 50 family members attended the funeral
Posted by: Cheap Jordans | March 25, 2011 at 10:07 AM
I don’t normally comment on blogs but your post was a real call to action. Thank you for a great read, I will be sure to bookmark your site and check in now and again.
Posted by: CNA Duties | April 06, 2011 at 03:40 AM
Great post! I would also recommend the book E-myth, every entrepreneur should give it a read.
Posted by: CNA Practice Test | April 06, 2011 at 03:44 AM
Thanks for posting this. Awesome idea!
Thanks for nice post !
Posted by: Sport toys | April 06, 2011 at 04:24 AM